Handling disputes after they have cooled down

couple de femmes en conflit

In a couple, disa­gree­ments are per­fect­ly nor­mal and heal­thy : the two mem­bers of a couple are two indi­vi­duals with their own beliefs, per­so­na­li­ties, histories…

In fact, there are two types of dis­pute : soluble and inso­luble. In the case of resol­vable dif­fe­rences, you need to work on your abi­li­ty to com­pro­mise and find a solu­tion that suits both mem­bers of the couple. 

💡 We also recom­mend our article : https://www.unio-preparation.com//en/couple-life/#tip‑4. Here you’ll find all our tips for a more suc­cess­ful mar­ried life, inclu­ding advice on how to get through dif­fi­cult times together.

On the other hand, in the case of an inso­luble dis­pute, there are two solu­tions : accept that the situa­tion remains as it is (« we don’t agree on eve­ry­thing, that’s nor­mal »), or decide that the rela­tion­ship can­not sur­vive this disa­gree­ment (« you want a child and I’m sure I don’t. Maybe it’s wiser to sepa­rate now.»).

In a Care Bear world, wha­te­ver the type of dis­pute, it’s all set­tled in « good unders­tan­ding », without rai­sing the stakes. In real life, it’s often not that simple : strong emo­tions, hurt­ful memo­ries, fatigue… all come into play. Tem­pers flare, some­times awk­ward words are exchan­ged and the dia­logue breaks down. 
Don’t panic, it’s per­fect­ly nor­mal. There are a num­ber of tech­niques that can be used to prevent the tone from beco­ming too hea­ted and to ensure that the argu­ment is conduc­ted in a res­pect­ful man­ner. This is what you deal with inUnio ses­sion 5. One of these is the  90/​10 rulerule, which we’ll leave you to discover. 

Argu­ments are nor­mal and part of eve­ry cou­ple’s life. On the other hand, we think it’s dan­ge­rous to pre­tend that nothing has hap­pe­ned in the wake of these dis­putes. Here’s why. This can lead to resent­ment or spite, one of the most common 
10 rela­tion­ship ene­mies to avoid
.

Why go back to disputes in the cold ?

Argu­ments can lead to resent­ment and disap­point­ment. Dis­cus­sion and connec­tion are bro­ken, and it can feel like we’re against each other, rather than toge­ther against the problem.

If, fol­lo­wing a conflict, eve­ryone goes their sepa­rate ways, then comes back a few minutes/​hours/​days later as if nothing had hap­pe­ned, then what has been hurt can­not be repai­red. And ins­tead of fading away over time, the wound remains beneath the sur­face, accu­mu­la­ting… and wea­ke­ning the relationship.

A post-fight dis­cus­sion does seve­ral things : 

  • On the one hand, to get to the heart of the mat­ter (whe­reas in the heart of the dis­pute we often remain on an emo­tio­nal level), to unders­tand what real­ly hap­pe­ned. Are you fami­liar with the 90/​10 rule ? Only 10% of conflicts can be explai­ned by the sub­ject of the disa­gree­ment at a given moment ; 90% stem from long-stan­ding situa­tions, often pre­da­ting the relationship.
    For example, if my hus­band cuts me off and I leave in a huff, it’s not just because of his atti­tude at the time, but because it acti­vates a wound in me (for example, having been brought up in a home where chil­dren were never given the floor).
  • And as a bonus, it’s also an oppor­tu­ni­ty to apologize.
couple homme femme en conflit

How do you come back from the brink ?

OK, but how do we go about it ? We’re alrea­dy wai­ting for the two of us to real­ly « come down ».

Julie and John Gott­man, renow­ned couple the­ra­pists, pro­pose five steps to achieve this : 

  • Take turns tal­king about how you felt during the argu­ment (sad­ness, anger, wor­ry, shame…). To do this, it’s impor­tant not to inter­rupt the other per­son, and above all not to inva­li­date their fee­lings (« you shouldn’t have been angry about that »).
  • Take turns des­cri­bing your point of view on what real­ly hap­pe­ned during the argu­ment. Vali­date the other per­son’s ver­sion of events, but remem­ber that vali­da­ting their words doesn’t mean you neces­sa­ri­ly agree with them.
    By saying, for example : « From your point of view, I unders­tand why you feel this way and need that. I unders­tood ».
  • Iden­ti­fy your « trig­gers » : these are your long-stan­ding vul­ne­ra­bi­li­ties (often pre­da­ting the rela­tion­ship) that may explain the esca­la­tion of conflict in cer­tain cir­cum­stances, and tell the part of your sto­ry asso­cia­ted with them. You’ll emerge from this stage with a bet­ter unders­tan­ding of each other.
  • Accept your share of res­pon­si­bi­li­ty and admit the role you played in this conflict.
  • Dis­cuss how you could bet­ter react toge­ther to the next argu­ment. Esta­blish a plan of action to avoid esca­la­tion at the next disagreement.
excuses et réconciliation d'un couple

Highlight certain operating patterns

But this post-dis­pute dis­cus­sion is also an oppor­tu­ni­ty to reflect on your « posi­tion » and that of your part­ner in the conflict. Basi­cal­ly, the­ra­pists dis­tin­guish bet­ween two types of people : 

  • The aggres­sive defen­der, who is often sen­si­tive, tou­chy, and will qui­ck­ly turn to anger and argument.
  • The pas­sive-aggres­sive, see­min­gly very conci­lia­to­ry, who shuns conflict. The other side of the coin is that, very often, this appa­rent kind­ness (« we’ll do it your way, no wor­ries ») will be paid for with other tools (clum­si­ness, for­get­ful­ness, late­ness…), « unin­ten­tio­nal­ly » to make the other per­son angry and then reproach him or her for this anger.

If you’re two « aggres­sive defen­ders », you’re pro­ba­bly an explo­sive couple, which isn’t neces­sa­ri­ly a pro­blem ; you’ll just have to learn to tem­per each other.

If you’re both, each of you will have to make an effort (tem­pe­ring on one side, lear­ning to face and express your­self on the other).

The tri­ckiest thing is for a couple of two « conci­lia­tors » : the risk is to navi­gate in a field of bombs as each flees the conflict. You’ll need to learn how to com­mu­ni­cate your frus­tra­tions, genes…

In this res­pect, it is impor­tant that the « rolesIt’s not a mat­ter of « it’s always the same guy ».trans­fer«On the other hand, the part­ner in ques­tion can build up resent­ment, and the situa­tion can evolve into a real conflict (open or latent).

In conclu­sion, we’d like to rei­te­rate that this stage is not to be neglec­ted at all ! It will avoid the snow­ball effect of resent­ments, and allow you to get to know each other a lit­tle bet­ter each time. Don’t hesi­tate to ask us ques­tions if you’re having trouble put­ting this tech­nique into prac­tice – we’re here to help !

And if you want to dis­co­ver the Unio pre­pa­ra­tion, it’s 
here
!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be publi­shed. Requi­red fields are mar­ked *

Blog
Most popu­lar articles :
Cate­go­ries :
➡️ Who we are
We are Lysiane and Romain new­ly­weds and co-foun­ders of Unio pre­ma­ri­tal counseling. 
A few years ago, we were exact­ly where you are now. We deci­ded to get mar­ried and set about pre­pa­ring for our big day with great excitement. 
It was great, but some­thing was clear­ly mis­sing. We wan­ted to to give real mea­ning to our com­mit­ment and pre­pare our­selves properly. 
That’s how Unio was born : the 100% secu­lar & online pre­ma­ri­tal coun­se­ling pro­gram. Read more »
➡️ Pre­pa­ring for mar­riage with Unio :
For lay the foun­da­tions for a solid mar­riage without spen­ding hours on it, and without going to church. 
Our pre­ma­ri­tal coun­se­ling program :
  • ✅ 100% secular
  • ✅ 100% online
  • ✅ 100% fun
réflexion préparation au mariage
cadeau-saint-valentin-unio
Offrez le parcours pour la saint Valentin 💘
👉 Profitez de la préparation au mariage Unio à 199€ au lieu de 273€
Et c'est jusqu'au 29/02/24 !
cadeau-saint-valentin-unio
Offrez Unio pour la saint Valentin 💘
👉 199€ au lieu de 273€ jusqu'au 29/02/24